Obergefell v Hodges briefs

Before the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) was decided, over 70% of states and the District of Columbia already recognized same-sex marriage, and only 13 states had bans. Fourteen same-sex couples and two men whose same-sex partners had since passed away, claimed Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee violated the. Obergefell v. Hodges Summary. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the 14 same-sex couples who sued for the validity of their marriages to be upheld across state lines. It held that laws making same-sex marriage illegal violated both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Key Players in Obergefell v No. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, 14-574 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____ JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, et al., Respondents. [Additional Case Captions Listed Inside Front Cover The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. OBERGEFELL et al. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al

Obergefell v. Hodges - A Brief History of Civil Rights in ..

Interest Groups | Texas Government

Brief of petitioners James Obergefell, et al. filed. Feb 27 2015: Brief amicus curiae of The County of Cuyahoga, Ohio filed. Feb 27 2015: Brief amici curiae of Mae Kuykendall, David Upham and Michael Worley in support of neither party and urging affirmance on question 1 filed. VIDED. Mar 02 201 68%. of non-LGBT adults rated the same satisfaction level in that time period. 87%. of LGBT people were happy in the two weeks after the Obergefell decision. 62%. of LGBT people reported higher-than-average levels of life satisfaction after the decision. Executive Summary. On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that all same-sex couples. Get Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee Obergefell v. Hodges, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5-4) on June 26, 2015, that state bans on same-sex marriage and on recognizing same-sex marriages duly performed in other jurisdictions are unconstitutional under the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.. The two questions presented by the case—the.

Obergefell V. Hodges Case Brief - Summary - Brief - Key ..

  1. JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al., Respondents. ----- ----- On Writs Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit ----- ----- BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE SCHOLARS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CHILDREN IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER
  2. Jim Campbell: With 5-4 gay marriage decision, battle far from over (USA Today, 2015-06-26) Audio and transcript: U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges - Question 1 (2015-04-28) Audio and transcript: U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges - Question 2 (2015-04-28) SCOTUSblog docket page: Obergefell v. Hodges
  3. Background. In June of 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v.Hodges 1 that the Constitution guarantees all same-sex couples the right to marry, extending marriage to same-sex couples throughout the U.S. At the time of the decision, 13 states did not allow same-sex couples to marry and 18 states had just granted same-sex couples the right to marry in the prior year.
  4. A brief timeline of same-sex marriage. June 26, 2015: In Obergefell v. Hodges, the United States Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is protected under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Consequently, same-sex marriages bans were struck down as unconstitutional
  5. Obergefell v. Hodges Case Brief . Facts of the case. Groups of same-sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states' bans on same-sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same-sex marriages that occurred in jurisdictions that provided for such.

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ ˈ oʊ b ər ɡ ə f ɛ l / OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Obergefell v. Hodges. Media. Oral Argument - April 28, 2015 (Part 1) Oral Argument - April 28, 2015 (Part 2) Opinion Announcement - June 26, 2015 (Part 1) Opinion Announcement - June 26, 2015 (Part 2) Opinions. Syllabus ; Opinion of the Court (Kennedy) Dissenting opinion (Roberts The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell resolved the outstanding cases that were then-pending in U.S. Courts of Appeals throughout the country. As discussed in previous reports, APA also filed amicus briefs in cases in the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 11th Circuits prior to the Obergefell decision

A decision in the case, Obergefell v. Hodges, was issued on June 26, 2015. Read the ruling here. Party Briefs to SCOTUS. Obergefell v. Hodges involved cases from four states, where plaintiffs were seeking the freedom to marry or respect for their marriages legally performed in other states. In the spring of 2015, all parties sounded off with. Justia › US Law › US Case Law › US Supreme Court › Volume 576 › Obergefell v. Hodges. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee define marriage as a union between one man and one woman. Plaintiffs challenged the laws as violating the Fourteenth Amendment A locked padlock) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-.. View Obergefell v. Hodges Case Brief.docx from BLAW 371 at University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Obergefell v. Hodges Facts o Groups of same-sex couples sued their state agencies in Ohio, Michigan

Obergefell v. Hodges. Brief Filed: 5/1/2014 Court: 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Year of Decision: 2014. Read full-text amicus brief (PDF, 506KB) APA's amicus briefs present an accurate and comprehensive summary of the current state of scientific and professional knowledge concerning sexual orientation, same-sex relationships, and the. CASE SUMMARY: OBERGEFELL V. HODGES On January 16, 2015, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in DeBoer v. Snyder,1 a case in which the Sixth Circuit upheld laws in Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio, and Michigan banning same-sex marriag This new edition includes full coverage of the Supreme Court's term that ended in June 2015. It features extensive coverage of a number of Supreme Court cases that have generated national attention, including: Obergefell v. Hodges, where the Court legalized same-sex marriage, by holding that state bans on such marriages violate both the Equal. Richard Hodges replaced Mr. Himes as Defendant after being appointed Director of the Ohio Department of Health in August 2014. On April 24, 2014 Appellee Obergefell filed the Appellee Brief. Appellant Himes filed a Reply Brief on May 12, 2014. During this period, numerous amicus briefs were filed to support each side

Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court of the United States June 26, 2015 Statement of the case: James Obergefell and his partner at the time, John, wanted to get married since John became terminated ill. The couple were from Ohio, a state which banned same-sex marriage. James and John agreed to marry in Maryland, one of the states that were not illegal same-sex marriage at the time Hodges Case Summary and Significance - FindLaw. Obergefell v. Hodges Case Summary and Significance. In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court held that states must recognize marriages between same-sex couples. The case was narrowly decided on a 5-4 vote, with Justice Anthony Kennedy issuing the swing vote and writing the opinion for the majority Hodges. On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, recognizing that same-sex couples have access to the same marriage rights as their opposite-sex counterparts throughout the country. All state laws banning same-sex marriage were overruled by the Court's decision Proponents and Opponents. A record 148 amicus (friend of the court) briefs were filed with the Supreme Court in Obergefell v.Hodges, beating the previous record of 136 filed in a 2013 case concerning Obamacare.The briefs filed in support of gay marriage included one by 370 small and large businesses, one by 300 Republican officeholders and activists, and one filed by a group of former high. Obergefell is the named plaintiff from the landmark United States Supreme Court marriage equality case. Obergefell v. Hodges. Following the decision on June 26, 2015, he embraced a new career as an. LBGTQ+ activist

A legal analysis of the Supreme Court's historic marriage equality ruling in Obergefell v Hodges and Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion. is a Kennedy-esque take on Mary Bonauto's brief. It. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), was a watershed case in American history, granting same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide. James Obergefell lived in Ohio with his partner, John Arthur. The couple wanted to get married, but at the time, the State of Ohio forbade same-sex marriage • Essential excerpts from 'Obergefell v. Hodges': Dissenting opinion by Justice Scalia (June 19, 2015) If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider.

Obergefell v

The count for Obergefell v. Hodges stands at 139. 147 [updated: 17 April 2015] 149 [updated] LINKS TO ALL THE BRIEFS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE ABA WEBSITE HERE Amicus Brief in Obergefell v. Hodges. Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 15-12. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 15-10. 48 Pages Posted: 14 Mar 2015 Last revised: 21 Mar 2015. See all articles by Andrew Koppelman Andrew Koppelman. Northwestern University School of Law

April 3, 2015. Obergefell v. Hodges is a case before the U.S. Supreme that will determine whether states have the right to define marriage and to decide whether to recognize same-sex marriages as performed in another state. The National Association of Evangelicals joined an amici brief with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, The Church of. Obergefell v. Hodges, (U.S. Supreme Court, Slip No. 14-556. June 26, 2015). Legal rights previously enjoyed by traditional married couples upon the death or disability of a spouse are now available to same-sex spouses, putting them on the same level. These new rights arise not just in the event of a death of a same-sex spouse, but also in the. Brief for the Respondents, 2015 WL 1384104, DeBoer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (No. 14-571) 5. Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners, 2015 WL 1022690, Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (No. 14-571) 3. Brief of Massachusetts, California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130 Fax +1 301-589-1131 learnmore@streetlaw.or

202-393-2100 • fax 202-393-2134 • (800) 225-4008 order line Issue Brief IF15H01 www.frc.org Critical Analysis of Obergefell v. Hodges Travis Weber, Esq. What did the Court hold in Obergefell? In a 5-4 opinion, the Supreme Court held in Obergefell v. Hodges1 that states must license same-sex marriages and recognize such licenses issued by. Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Supreme Court Decision June 26, 2015; Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Reply Brief of Petitioners in Support of the Freedom to Marry April 17, 2015; Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Brief of Respondent Ohio Department of Health in Opposition to the Freedom to Marry March 27, 201 Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Brief of Respondent Ohio Department of Health in Opposition to the Freedom to Marr Obergefell V.Hodges is a Supreme court case that sanctioned same-sex marriage in each of the 50 states. The case occurred when a man named James Obergefell sued his home state Ohio to tell the general population of Ohio how the forbidding of gay marriage wasn't right and an infringement of his rights as a citizen. Certain rights are counted in the Constitution Obergefell v. Hodges (Obergefell) was the recent groundbreaking Supreme Court case that legalized gay marriage across the entire United States. There is no doubt Obergefell will go down as one of the most widely known decisions the Supreme Court has made, in fact, Obergefell, broke the record for most amicus curiae briefs filed with the court.

OBERGEFELL v. HODGES Supreme Court US Law LII ..

Obergefell v. Hodges: Same-Sex Marriage Legalized Congressional Research Service Summary On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges requiring states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages that were legally formed in other states Obergefell v Hodges: Marriage Equality at the Supreme Court Victory. tags: Cases National/Federal Marriage & Relationships. Overview. June 26, 2015: Victory! In a blockbuster legal and cultural moment for the country, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples in the United States, no matter where they live, have the same legal right to. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) is commonly referred to as the same-sex marriage case that legalized same-sex marriage at the federal level in the United States. While this is true, it is more accurate to state that the Supreme Court decision determined that it is unconstitutional for a state to refuse giving a marriage license to a same-sex couple (Obergefell v

Tribes, Same-Sex Marriage, and Obergefell v. Hodges Ann E. Tweedy has served as an associate professor at Hamline University School of Law and currently serves as in-house counsel for Muck - leshoot Indian tribe in Washington state. She was previously a visiting assistant professor at Michigan State University College of Law and Obergefell v. Hodges, and three cases consolidated with it by the Supreme Court—Tanco v.Haslam, DeBoer v.Snyder, and Bourke v.Beshear—were federal-court challenges to state laws and constitutional amendments adopted by the voters of Ohio, Tennessee, Michigan, and Kentucky that prohibited same-sex couples from marrying and/or forbid the state from recognizing the marriages of same-sex. Supreme Court precedent establishes that the government may not punish children for matters beyond their control. Same-sex marriage bans and non-recognition laws (marriage bans) do precisely this. The states argue that marriage is good for children, yet marriage bans categorically exclude an entire class of children - children of same-sex couples - from the legal, economic and social. Opinion for Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 192 L. Ed. 2d 609, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4250 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information 1 Case Summary Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al. 576 US (2015) 1. Reference details Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of the United State

Marbury v

Obergefell v. Hodges - Case Briefs - LawAspec

Hodges was last Term's blockbuster case. But there has been lots of debate about whether the decision is significant for more than just its momentous holding that same-sex marriage is a constitutionally protected right. In his Comment on Obergefell for Harvard Law Review 's annual Supreme Court issue, Kenji Yoshino argues that Obergefell. Just after the victory in Obergefell v. Hodges, members of the LGBTQ community rejoiced on the steps of the nation's highest court, couples were wed in mass marriage ceremonies and the White House was lit with the rainbow colors of the LGBTQ pride flag. The national recognition of marriage equality was a momentous step that opened the door to.

Obergefell v. Hodges - Case Summary and Case Brie

Marriage Equality. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. In a 5 to 4 ruling, the Court determined that the Constitution guarantees every American the right to marry the person they love. Even with this ruling, GLAAD will continue to push for accelerated acceptance of LGBT people, couples, and families. Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) The Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) case involved the marriage of same sex couples. Groups of same sex couples sued their state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of them refusing to recognize legal same sex marriages

Firewalls Put to the Test—First Libert | News | First Liberty

Obergefell v. Hodges - SCOTUSblo

Credit: Emily Jan/NPR. This week's same-sex-marriage cases at the Supreme Court brought in a record number of friend-of-the-court briefs — 148 of them, according to the court, beating the. Toledo Law Prof. Strang files amicus brief in Obergefell v. Hodges. April 15, 2015. Legal scholars of originalism, including Professor Lee J. Strang, filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges, a consolidation of same-sex marriage cases.. The brief, filed in support of the respondents, addresses whether or not the Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a. Opinions in court cases. Court cases are supposed be a decision that is settled and decided on law and fact. However, it is nearly impossible to look at any court ruling without noticing an opinion making its way into the decision.The Obergefell v. Hodges court case is an example of how the Supreme Court interpreted law to make a decision

Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Brief for Petitioners in No. 14-562, p. 54. But the result petitioners seek is far less democratic. They ask nine judges on this Court to enshrine their definition of marriage in the Federal Constitution and thus put it beyond the reach of the normal democratic process for the entire Nation Obergefell v Hodges (2015) STUDY. Flashcards. Learn. Write. Spell. Test. PLAY. Match. Gravity. Created by. Erinldunn. Terms in this set (5) Facts of the Case. In 2015, Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee still defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman, 14 same-sex couples and 2 widows of a same-sex partner filed suit in their. 8 obergefell v. HODGES ALITO, J., dissenting preaching about the proper method of interpreting the Constitution or the virtues of judicial self-restraint and humility cannot compete with the temptation to achieve what is viewed as a noble end by any practicable means

Scotus cases similar to or like Obergefell v. Hodges. Landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Wikipedia H istory really matters in Obergefell v. Hodges [et al.], the US Supreme Court case that has brought equal marriage rights to same-sex couples in every state. Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, needs the history of marriage to lay the groundwork for his reasoning. Before addressing the principles and precedents that govern these cases, the opinion begins, it is.

Part 8: 2015-MAR: Briefs sent to the U.S. Supreme Court by the Obama Administrations, various groups & individuals concerning SSM in the case Obergefell v. Hodges. Part 9: Some of the points raised in briefs submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court that advocate marriage equality. Part 10: Some briefs supporting or opposing marriage equalit Jim Obergefell (/ ˈ oʊ b ər ɡ ə f ɛ l / OH-bər-gə-fel; born July 7, 1966) is an American civil rights activist known as the plaintiff in the U.S. Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage in the United States. After his husband, John Arthur, died in 2013, and his inability to legally be considered Arthur's surviving spouse on his death certificate. 37.6, no party or party's counsel authored this brief in whole or in part, or contributed money that was intended to fund its preparation or submission; and no person other than the amicus Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015). 3 grant Davis's petition but also ask the parties to address whether Obergefell should be overruled Amicus Briefs in Obergefell v. Hodges the U.S. Supreme Court's recent marriage equality decision Professor Peggy Davis New York University Law School The amicus brief that Professor Davis and the NYU Law School Experiential Learning Lab submitted in the Obergefell case drew on the convergent histories of marriage, race, slavery and emancipation

Obergefell v. Hodges / Summary of Decision . The Supreme Court ruled for the same-sex couples in a 5-4 decision. Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito each wrote dissenting opinions In Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), the United States Supreme Court ruled that marriage is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore must be afforded to same-sex couples. The ruling ensured that statewide bans on same-sex marriage could not be held up as constitutional. Fast Facts: Obergefell v Rainbows abounded on the morning of Friday, June 26, 2015, when the United States Supreme Court held 5-4 that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry and a right to have their legal marriages recognized in every state.. The Court's decision in Obergefell v.Hodges was not unexpected.The divide in the Court, too, was not unexpected: Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority.

Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse. Obergefell v. Hodges. On July 19, 2013, two men, married in Maryland, filed suit in the Southern District of Ohio seeking declaratory and injunctive relief compelling Ohio to recognize their marriage. The complaint was based on Ohio's alleged violation of plaintiffs' rights under the First and Fourteenth. A Brief History of Civil Rights in the United States. Obergefell v. Hodges A Timeline of the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S. Civil Rights for the Disabled Toggle Dropdown. Disability Rights in the 1960s and 70s The Equal Education Movement. Jim Obergefell and Richard Hodges, the namesakes of the landmark 2015 Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage across the country, penned a fiery new op-ed urging voters to cast.

Rewriting the Supreme Court's landmark gay rights decision Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v.Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry.In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and. Obergefell v Hodges conclusion-5 to 4-The Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples in the same manner as it does to opposite-sex couples. Judicial precedent has held that the right to marry is a. By Jeffrey Masters. March 16 2021 9:00 AM EDT. While same-sex couples have been able to wed in the U.S. since the 2015 Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, Jim Obergefell says the fight. On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges held that it is constitutionally impermissible to deny same-sex couples the right to marry.2 To do otherwise, the Court found, is a violation of both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the 14th. Obergefell v. Hodges [1]. Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015). declared that same-sex couples possess a fundamental right to marry but left implementation's daily particulars to federal, state, and local officials. Because formal recognition of marriage equality is a valuable first step but realizing actual marriage equality will.

Docket for 14-556 - Supreme Cour

CONCERNING OBERGEFELL V. HODGES Pursuant to the Court's Order to Show Cause of July 23, 2015 and its subsequent procedural order of August 4, 2015, Appellant Kinney hereby submits her memorandum of law regarding the impact of the decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S._, 2015 WL 2473451 Oune 26, 2015) on the question reported to the Cour The Undetermined Legacy of 'Obergefell v. Hodges' Beyond legalizing same-sex marriage, Justice Kennedy's opinion made profound arguments about liberty under the Constitution and advanced a. For those unfamiliar, Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) is the Supreme Court case that established marriage equality at the federal level in the United States. It requires all 50 states to license as well as recognize marriage licenses issued in other states for same-sex couples. It is a landmark case and hugely important to the LGBT+ community at. Obergefell v. Hodges involves James Obergefell and John Arthur James from Ohio. John James Arthur was diagnosed with ALS in 2011. They were married in the state of Maryland on July 11, 2013. Same-sex marriage is illegal in Ohio, They wanted Obergefell to be named as James' surviving spouse on his death certificate Obergefell: A Victory for Children. June 26, 2015. By. Michael S. Wald. Comments ( 1 ) The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (and three other cases) is obviously a landmark decision of enormous importance to gay individuals and the interests of liberty and equality. As someone whose career has focused on the needs and interests.

From friends of the Court: Same-sex marriage leads to

Much attention has been devoted to the potential role a Justice Amy Coney Barrett might play in overturning Roe v. Wade and ending the nationwide legalization of abortion.Now current Justice Clarence Thomas is also raising the possibility of overturning Obergefell v. Hodges and returning the legalization of gay marriage to the states. The Supreme Court was unanimous in its decision not to hear. Smith, Catherine E. and Fontana, Lauren and Pollvogt, Susannah and Washington, Tanya, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. Hodges (March 9, 2015) Supporters of marriage equality celebrate the Obergefell v.Hodges decision outside the Supreme Court on June 26, 2015. They should also be celebrating a chicken thief named Jack Skinner. Photo by.